Talk:Rotter kidnapping/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: TheBritinator (talk · contribs) 03:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 06:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning (talk) 06:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Prose and MoS
[edit]Infobox and lead
[edit]- Change dating system on infobox to dmy, check List of date formats by country as the topic is in Liechtenstein.
Done
- Lead is a bit short but it's alright.
- Done
- Probably mention the other victims and specify the names of the perpetrators.
- Not sure if this is necessary, might convolute the lead a bit.
Background
[edit]- by 1933, Nazism in Germany, and in January 1933, due to this, from the press, add comma at the end.
- Done
- Jewish background, pluralize.
- Done
- emigrated, emigrate.
- Done
- as they falsely accused, change to who falsely accused.
- Done
Kidnapping
[edit]- along with Alfred's wife, Fritz's domestic partner, Gaflei on the Alps, though once he realized, who was also injured, re-unite with Julie Wolff, add comma at the end.
- Done
- This however, was unsuccessful as they fought back and began to escape on foot., rewrite, probably omit however.
- Done
Trials and aftermath
[edit]- Rheinbeger and Frommelt, add comma after Rheinbeger. Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Serial commas, though per the same MoS entry, not really ambiguous therefore it can be kept but I would recommend for it to be added.
- Done
- In October of the same year, Liechtenstein to come to an end, after leave Liechtenstein and, add comma at the end.
- Done
- Italicize mentions of "Stolperstein" in image caption.
- Done
Images
[edit]- Images have proper licenses and are relevant.
Refs
[edit]- Reference all seem reliable.
- For reference 2, remove the "last=Editorial" as it's not the name of the author. Vice versa with reference 4.
- Done
- For reference 6, when using the wikilinked page of an author, use the "authorlink=" template without the [] brackets for the page of the author, then the "first=" and "last=" for the name of the author, so that it's formatted properly.
- Done
Spotchecks
[edit]- Earwig picks like 1% which is like negligible. Manual check shows no sign of copyright violations/plagiarism.
Misc
[edit]- No ongoing edit war on the article, focused and broad on the topic considering information about the topic would be a few decades old, no bias seen.
- @TheBritinator: Here are my comments, hope they can be addressed. Arconning (talk) 15:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Addressed the comments, @Arconning:. Let me know if anything more needs done. Thanks. TheBritinator (talk) 18:43, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
