Talk:Roth 401(k)/Archives/2016
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Assessment comment
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Roth 401(k)/Archives/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| The article covers substantially all the material it can, which is made easier by it being a narrow subject. It has the definitive references and all the material in the article agrees with them from what I can tell. Thus in some ways it actually exceeds the B class assessment. - Taxman Talk 13:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 13:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 04:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Summary
This summary is incredibly poor. The dates of different modifications are irrelevant; a description of the nature of the subject of the article is vitally important. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.81.29.253 (talk) 06:11, 7 August 2016 (UTC)