Talk:Roth 401(k)/Archives/2013

Corporate Partners?

What is meant by that? If it's a list of companies known to offer the roth 401(k) option, state that, if not, state what it is. - Taxman ^Talk 19:45, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

External link

Re-added my link roth-401k-forum.com to Roth 401k. Can you please explain why you keep deleting it? You keep in the link to roth401k.com but take mine out? My site has more information, more visitors and more original content. I added that link way back in December 2005 well before anyone even knew what a Roth 401k was and certainly before the link to roth401k.com was put in there. It was reviewed back then by several people and they all agreed it was ok. Now you come along all delete happy and take it out. How can you justify taking my link out and leaving roth401k.com link? Even some of the content written on the Roth 410k page was taken from my site. My site is useful to anyone who has questions about Roth 401k. Please explain.

I removed it based on WP:EL and the number of times it had been removed by other editors. That and the fact that it is your site indicate it is against what WP:EL is for. The other listed sites have better and more definitive information with less of an attempt at advertising. The fact that you've re-added it without discussing first along with the other facts shows that the site is clearly more in your self interest to be listed than Wikipedia's. And trust me, 2005 was not well before anyone new what it was. Many of us caught it in the conference reports before EGTRRA 2001 was passed. Finally where is this link to several people reviewing the link and agreeing to include it? - Taxman ^Talk 22:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Taxmen has done simmilar thing to me too. When I first added a link to my retirement planning website he deleted it saying it has Ads but he never deleted a simmilar website with far more Ads and extremely low quality content. Finally another Admin deleted the link that Taxmen was too keen to keep. The only possible reason could be hidden money involved .I suspect Taxmen takes money from some websites in order to keep them here while removing other genuine websites.Now he may say I broke some xyz rule by pointing finger at him which he is likely to do.But this is purely double standards and bureaucratic attitude which he himself agrees in his own profile.He clearly is misusing the powers given to him by wiki.

When we make a website which has genuine information, we ofcoure want to get the word out for it and this is seen as spam by Taxmen and his associates ( I am not blamming all Admins). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.225.130.18 (talk) 15:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Your post is left wanting for correct facts. I didn't remove it saying it had ads, simply that it didn't meet out external links policies. Another admin removed it again for having too many ads and too little content. And perhaps I didn't see another site that was even worse than yours, but I can't catch everything, just the things I do see. No where was I keen to keep this other site either. And that another site is even worse than yours isn't a defense nor does it make yours meet our policies. It's interesting you claim hidden money when you are the one adding your site repeatedly to pages it doesn't belong on. I have not done anything wrong and you have no evidence of it. I suppose I shouldn't even bother replying because your record speaks for itself. See this diff for anyone interested, then read the various policies against misusing Wikipedia for personal gain. - Taxman ^Talk 18:10, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

rollover

Rollover:

Rolling over the vested part amount to another plan, and if a person terminated from the company A to company B the vested part amount will be treated as rollover, but if he changes the plan within the company is treated as vesting.

IRA-Rollover :( Individual Retirement Account)

From stated above incase the company not accepting to maintain the vested part of employee from the company A.( until he eligible to participate in the 401k plan) The temporary Account will be open for keeping the vested portion of the employee, till he become eligible for participating in the other companies 401k plan.

Rollover

Rollover:

Rolling over the vested part amount to another plan, and if a person terminated from the company A to company B the vested part amount will be treated as rollover, but if he changes the plan within the company is treated as vesting.

IRA-Rollover :( Individual Retirement Account)

From stated above incase the company not accepting to maintain the vested part of employee from the company A.( until he eligible to participate in the 401k plan) The temporary Account will be open for keeping the vested portion of the employee, till he become eligible for participating in the other companies 401k plan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.199.216.217 (talk) 10:23, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

The Roth 401(k) plan

The article states "Higher-income workers who wish to save the maximum amount allowed may favor the Roth 401(k) because it effectively allows greater real contributions, as post-tax dollars are more valuable than pre-tax dollars"

Can someone please clarify this statement?

Also, this article does not mention whether making contributions to a Roth 401(k) would preclude one from making contributions to a Roth IRA. Can we therefore assume that it would not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by WPisgreat (talk • contribs) 02:23, 25 February 2012 (UTC)