Jump to content

Talk:Rosetown, Saskatchewan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Invite

[edit]

Hi, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Saskatchewan WikiProject and WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods! The Saskatchewan WikiProject is a fairly new WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, and Wikiprojects, to do with anything Saskatchewan.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

SriMesh | talk 21:52, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Lead Paragraph

[edit]
  • 1. Context -Town geographically localised community located within Saskatchewan. describing the category or field in which the idea belongs.
  • 2. Characterization - appearance, age, gender, educational level, vocation or occupation, financial status, marital status, social status, cultural background, hobbies, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ambitions, motivations, personality, what the term refers to as used in the given context.
  • 3. Explanation - deeper meaning and background.
  • 4. Compare and contrast - how it relates to other topics, if appropriate. need to add about community pop in comparison to other community population comparison
  • 5. Criticism - include criticism if there has been significant, notable criticism. need to compare to other communities of Saskatchewan when communities finish up...and look at the comglomerated statistics from each - as well .

SriMesh | talk 21:52, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Rosetown History with Rosetown Article

[edit]

I propose a merging of the Rosetown history article with the Rosetown article. It would help expand the Rosetown article. Mr. C.C. 18:36, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a good idea, and I agree wholeheartedly. The Rosetown Airport stub article may be best as a stand alone, perhaps to help support the list of Airports and comply to the Wikiproject transporation guidelines. The school articles when started should also probably be stand alone as well to comply with wikiproject educationSriMesh | talk 21:52, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]