Talk:Rosenberg's tree frog

	Rosenberg's tree frog is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education assignment: Behavioral Ecology 2022

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Britneys99 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Frogboi123, I Bet on Losing Frogs, Yarlagaddas.

— Assignment last updated by CalJS (talk) 01:17, 14 October 2022 (UTC) I added more information to this article, including some sections and fleshed out existing sections. Britneys99 (talk) 02:20, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In-text citations should be placed after the period in a sentence. Other than that, I think this article is well-written and covers a good breadth of topics.I Bet on Losing Frogs (talk) 03:16, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Addition to "Diet" section, sentence clarity, italicization of genus and species

I expanded the diet section to include details about mature adult feeding during the breeding season. I also corrected several instances of non-italicized "H. rosenbergi". Frogboi123 (talk) 04:05, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

General Edits to Entire Paper

I went in and made a few grammatical and sentence structure edits. I tried to improve diction where I saw fit. I have a few recommendations. I think one would be gathering more references and more research. The more the merrier. The article seems like it is off to a good start. But, many of the categories are very short and there are only 10 total references, which will not be enough to make an article good. The next addition, I think would be to add more images with captions. Other than the bar on the right there is no photos of the frog. I think being able to see images of the frog would be helpful. I think on top of adding more information on the existing categories, another few ideas for more categories to add could include behavior, phylogeny, and ecology. Yarlagaddas (talk) 04:09, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]