Talk:Rosaura Sánchez

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Latin and Hispanic heritage Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Hispanic and Latino Americans portal This article is supported by WikiProject Latin and Hispanic heritage.

Question

I am a new editor. Does it make sense to add this page books to which Rosaura Sanchez contributed, such as José Martí′s Our America: From National to Hemispheric Cultural Studies? <refhttps://www.dukeupress.edu/Jose-Martis-Our-America/</ref>Iamheddy (talk) 21:07, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Iamheddy - I think it's reasonable to add a person's notable works, but usually when a person is a chapter author (or one of numerous contributors to a work) we avoid listing each one of those. It's better if we avoid making the entry look like a resume or CV. One of the things that was lacking in this entry was a good summary of the subject's contributions to her field (why she was particularly important). Earlier an editor added a quote that talked about her conception of a theoretical framework; if there is more information along those lines, that could be added in the prose. EricEnfermero (Talk) 21:58, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]