This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
I contest the nomination for speedy deletion. Rosa T. Sheng is a notable architect who has made significant contributions to the field, both in her architectural practice and in her leadership on promoting equity and inclusion. I believe most (if not all) of the article is encyclopedic in tone and well sourced. --Josh Wallaert (talk) 07:58, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
She's absolutely notable, but the article needs a complete rewrite. Since the move to draft, more information has been added, but nothing significant has been done to address the promotional, resume-like tone. The Mighty Glen (talk) 08:12, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the section on "Driving Cultural Transformation," which was structured like a resume, and replaced with a summary of this important work. Does that go some distance toward addressing your concerns? Per the criteria for speedy deletion, "If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced with text written from a neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion." Josh Wallaert (talk) 08:23, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Chopping that section does go a long way, and I've removed the speedy tag. But please look again at the wording: phrases like "nationally recognized portfolio", "prominent advocate", "has particular expertise", "a number of highly regarded projects", "played a major role in raising awareness", "build a platform of strong community support for change in the profession", etc. This is the language of LinkedIn, not of an encyclopedia. The Mighty Glen (talk) 08:28, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you, to a degree, but I think these sorts of issues should be negotiated by edits in an article, not speedy deletions. Thank you for removing the tag and for specifying some of the phrases that concern you. I'll work to address them.Josh Wallaert (talk) 08:33, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the wording that concerns you, except "prominent advocate." That's just a fact, and an important one. I think that should be sufficient to removing the maintenance tag, but of course you're free to revert. Josh Wallaert (talk) 08:48, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
