Talk:Roots Manuva

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Image

I've been informed that the image on this article is likely to be removed as "it illustrates a subject for which a free image could reasonably be found or created". If anyone has (or can source) a free image of Roots Manuva, please can you upload it for use as a replacement? Alternatively, feel free to dispute the removal of the image. To do this, edit the image (Image:RootsManuva PromoPhoto.jpg), add the {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} template and provide rationale as to why we should be allowed to use this as a fair use image. Cheers, Gram 15:10, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia

Hi, one more thing about the trivia. "Witness the fitness" might be associated with a classic song by Guru's jazzmatazz called "Loungin'" ...it says that "You should witness the slickness". It might be a pure coincidence, but just to let you know. By the way wikipedia in English is crazy. We're still working on ours... Cheers from Poland, Adam

Philosopher?

--58.164.23.246 (talk) 08:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, and all.

But this is an encyclopaedia, not a biography.

It sounds like it's written by a 15 year old.

Someone revert it?

Yes.

EDIT:

Yeah, don't worry about it then.

HINT HINT —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.217.211.192 (talk) 11:00, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Birth date

Curious here, why is his birthday simultaneously Sep. 8 (infobox) and Sep. 9 (first paragraph).--Dorwytch (talk) 11:45, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Influence

From the first paragraph:

> He has been described as "one of the most influential artists in British music history."

Preface: I don't want to shy away from this sentence merely because it is subjective. Wikipedia has good guidelines for dealing with subject with material such as this. Here on Wikipedia, we don't get to decide who is "most" influential. But we can talk more about the language and criteria that make sense.

In my view, this particular claim (quoted above) is not accurate.

Is it useful to republish inaccurate assessments? Not here in this article, at least.

This above sentence is cited, yes, but given its scope (all British music artists over history), it does not pass muster as a reasonable characterization. Also, it is not a good choice for the first paragraph.

The citation seems both cherry picked and imbalanced. How many other citations will agree with the above characterization? Probably few or none. There are simply too many other British musicians recognized as influential.

At the very least, such claims should be qualified or qualified. Influential to whom? Listeners? Other musicians? By what metric? Over what period of time? For what styles of music?

It is useful to use background context to form something like a basic litmus test. If we ask, "What are the influential British musicians of all time?", what range of opinions are useful? What kinds of criteria matter?

in terms of shaping the evolution of music, the Beatles come to mind. It is not hard to find mini high-quality citations to this effect.

Yes, I'm implying the existence of background knowledge and some vague kinds of consensus, at least with regards to what criteria are important.

More specifically, an artist like Tricky (credited for popularizing trip hop), is recognized as being influential in the hip hop genre. Such a sentence is useful in an introductory paragraph. It is specific and falsifiable. DavidCJames (talk) 22:59, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]