Talk:Rooikat

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / African

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	African military history task force

South Africa

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The manufacturer's website link is dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.179.121.192 (talk) 05:26 (UTC), 31 March 2007

Fair use rationale for Image:RooikatAFV1.jpg

Image:RooikatAFV1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:RooikatAFV.jpg

Image:RooikatAFV.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

machine guns

The box on the right says that two MG4 machineguns with 7.62mm are used. That can't be true, the (linked) Heckler&Koch MG4 is build for 5.56mm ammo. If the vehicle indeed employs two 7.62mm MGs (which doesn't sound unreasonable) then it must be different ones. For example here: http://www.panzerbaer.de/types/pix/za_rkw_105mm_rooikat_schema-001.jpg you can see a machine gun on top that resembles the Browning 7.62 from here: http://www.army.mil.za/equipment/weaponsystems/infantry/Machine_Guns.htm though that is not what I'd call a proof. Maybe someone with enough knowledge and reliable sources can clarify this issue. --OBrian (talk) 04:26, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Most probably they are Vektor MG4s, a derivative of the M1919A4 produced under license by Vektor Arms who used to be a division of Lyttelton Engineering Works (now part of Denel Land Systems). Those were and still are in common use in the RSA armed forces. Google should be able to verify--NJR_ZA (talk) 09:25, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"MG4" is simply the SANDF (and SADF before it) "in-house" designation of the M1919 which were updated (not manufactured from scratch) at Lyttleton. The main differences between the WW2 vintage pre-upgrade Browning M1919 and the "MG4" are: A new barrel and bolt changing the calibre from .303 British to 7.62 NATO. The feed mechanism was altered to use modern disintegrating links instead of the original fabric belts. Changes to the trigger mechanism to operate from an open bolt to prevent "cook-off" accidents. Source: "Kruigstuig van Suid Afrika" by Helmoed Romer Heitman, 1988, Struik, Cape Town, ISBN 086977638X, page 113. (It was also published in English, I just happen to own an Afrikaans version.) Both MGs on the Rooikat are Browning M1919 "MG4"s, one coaxial with the main gun and the other mounted flexibly on top of the turret. (BTW As these old guns wear out they are being replaced with new SS77 GPMGs in all roles in the SANDF. Roger (talk) 15:53, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I've changed the link.--OBrian (talk) 11:43, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.army-technology.com/projects/rooikat/
Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 10:56, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 19:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rooikat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.nelsonmandela.org/omalley/index.php/site/q/03lv00017/04lv00344/05lv00355/06lv00356.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:11, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Operational service

How can the Rooikat have "been in operational use with the SANDF since 1980" when production only started 1989?Royalcourtier (talk) 02:45, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Variants

The text does not clearly state that only the "original" variant armed with the 76mm gun exists in numbers and is in service. All the others exist only as prototypes or even merely as design concepts. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:43, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the name of the section to "Proposed Variants" to address this specific concern. --Katangais (talk) 11:59, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]