Jump to content

Talk:Ronnie Wallwork

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleRonnie Wallwork has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 15, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
September 9, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Style of play

[edit]

Anyone have any material on Ronnie's style of play? (such a section seems to appear in most football FAs and GAs, but I'm not sure if it is considered mandatory in order to reach such a status) At Albion he sat in front of the back four and pointed a lot... --Jameboy (talk) 12:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen him several times for Huddersfield. He played central midfield and was very much a rugged 'enforcer'. He also has a hard shot and netted three times in 16 appearances. BlueValour (talk) 02:22, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Initial Sheffield Wednesday contract

[edit]

I have altered this, again, to 'until the end of the season'. None of the sources I have seen say a 'six-moth contract'. For example, take the official Owls site here. BlueValour (talk) 02:19, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

England under-20 stats

[edit]

I'm having trouble locating Wallwork's England under-20 stats. The following articles confirm that he played in the team [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] but beyond that I can't find number of apps and goals. The stats at theFA.com don't seem to go back far enough. Can anyone help? Thanks. --Jameboy (talk) 18:37, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Ronnie Wallwork/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I'll be reviewing this article at some point today, any additional comments from other reviewers are welcome. -AMBerry (t|c) 12:37, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

Lead:

  • "United loaned out Wallwork to Carlisle United, Stockport County and Royal Antwerp." sounds a bit choppy to me, possibly link this sentence to the following one (i.e. ...Royal Antwerp, where he was banned from football...)?
I've re-jigged it further, please let me know what you think (or if Peanut4's edit was better I'll go with that... whichever really) --Jameboy (talk) 23:21, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
To be honest, I much prefer yours. Peanut4 (talk) 23:28, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Seconded. -AMBerry (t|c) 09:55, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Manchester United

  • The opening sentence on Wallwork's loan spell at Antwerp could possibly do with rephrasing, at the moment it doesn't quite sound right.
Because of the two relative clauses? Changed it around, let me know if it's OK. --Jameboy (talk) 23:00, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds much better now, thanks. -AMBerry (t|c) 09:55, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

West Bromwich Albion

  • "The move [to Huddersfield] was prompted by Town's escalating injury crisis." Is there a source for this statement?
I've removed the sentence. An article on the Huddersfield Town site mentions a couple of players suffering from "illness", which is a bit non-descript. However it is just one of several loan spells he completed and the reasons aren't particularly important IMO. If you disagree then I'll happily pop in a quote from (Huddersfield manager) Andy Ritchie, mentioning (as Peanut4 says) Wallwork's experience. --Jameboy (talk) 22:32, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from those points above I can't see anything that would prevent GA, so it's on hold for now. -AMBerry (t|c) 19:36, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Well done to everyone who contributed. -AMBerry (t|c) 09:55, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Ronnie Wallwork. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:23, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ronnie_Wallwork&oldid=1205378088"