Talk:Ronen Eldan

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 03:58, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Article remains to short to qualify for DYK; closing as unsuccessful

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Professor Ronen Eldan

... that Israeli Professor Ronen Eldan's (pictured) work has led to breakthroughs that have had profound impacts on the fields of statistics, machine learning, and theoretical computer science? Source: https://www.nyas.org/press-releases/prestigious-blavatnik-awards-for-young-scientists-in-israel-announces-its-2022-laureates/
- ALT1: ... that research done by Israeli Professor Ronen Eldan (pictured) of the Weizmann Institute of Science has led to breakthroughs that have had profound impacts on the fields of statistics, machine learning, and theoretical computer science? Source: https://www.nyas.org/press-releases/prestigious-blavatnik-awards-for-young-scientists-in-israel-announces-its-2022-laureates/

Created by Omert33 (talk). Self-nominated at 16:36, 12 February 2022 (UTC).[reply]

After foundational copyvio text was removed, the article became too short to be eligible, and no longer contains text supporting the heavily promotional wording of the proposed hook. Despite the significant cuts it also contains significant amounts of unsourced material. The image is a badly framed still from a YouTube video; it appears to be acceptably licensed, but I don't think it is worthy for the main page. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:04, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Omert33? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 03:36, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The nominator hasn't edited since March 9th and has not responded to a ping and a talk page message. They have also not edited the article in almost a month and have been unable to expand the article. Given their unresponsiveness there does not appear to be a path forward for the article at this time. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 07:22, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because to my opinion it does not constitute such a harsh request. If the requester sees flaw in the way things were phrased let him point them out so they may be recrified. I for one have made an effort so as to phrase it in a manner that does not constitute such a course of action. --Omer Toledano (talk) 20:09, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, if indeed there is fault, I have every intention of fixing it, just please don't delete the article. Awaiting your reply. Omer Toledano (talk) 20:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Omer Toledano, you clearly know what the copyright infringements were as you have attempted to reword them. Please see Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Respecting copyright. --John B123 (talk) 20:33, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Naturally. Likewise, any proactive assistance in trying to rectify the situation by rephrasing text which is deemed unsuitable would also be appreciated. --Omer Toledano (talk) 06:46, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all. I believe I have sufficiently rephrased and reworded the article enough so as to justify the removal of the copyright template. For your consideration. --Omer Toledano (talk) 08:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DanCherek:, as you requested I have initiated a temporary rewrite page. I believe the disputed 2.5 sentences are now in compliance. --Omer Toledano (talk) 15:00, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]