Talk:Roncarelli v Duplessis

Canada: Law Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Jehovah's Witnesses.

Decision

Roncarelli v Duplessis#Decision There is no such thing as a Court of Queen's Bench or King's Bench in Quebec. Perhaps it is the Superior Court of Quebec.. Ihis needs clarification. Peter Horn User talk 01:22, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That was the name of the highest appellate court in Quebec at that time. See the report of the Supreme Court decision: https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/2751/index.do Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 01:31, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]