Jump to content

Talk:Ronald Skirth/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Binksternet (talk) 14:47, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not as far as I know. I have found the Death Cert index record online and cited it in the article. I could order the death cert but it would cost £20 and would that not constitute 'original research'? But it is confirmed as 1977. Dwab3 86.6.134.33 (talk) 20:11, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I just wanted to know the situation. No need to spend so much for a death record! Binksternet (talk) 04:04, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: