Talk:Ron Watkins

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ron Watkins article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[QAnon#The Storm|"Great Awakening" or "the Storm"]] The anchor (#The Storm) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

There's no good evidence Ron Watkins has actually quit 8chan

It seems premature to call him a "former" site administrator. His own statements are the only "evidence" for this. No public person has stepped in to fill the void, so who is its administrator now? Jim doesn't have the technical skills. I think we should weaken this statement, but I have a COI. cc GorillaWarfare Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 19:59, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Psiĥedelisto: That's a fair point—given the amount of doubt cast upon it by sources (already reflected in the activities section) that's probably too unequivocal for the lead. I'll put in a little more detail to give that context. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 21:01, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GorillaWarfare: Thanks, the change you made in Special:Diff/1038486723 looks good to me.

Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 21:52, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Significant understatement in lead

I think this: Numerous journalists and researchers believe that one or both of the Watkinses know the identity of, or are themselves, "Q" is a significant understatement about the state of knowledge about Q. Two separate and independent stylometric analyses of Q's posts indicate that Ron Watkins took over posting as Q in 2018 from Paul Furber[1], as originally claimed/speculated by many. It seems now that after these investigations, journalists are a bit more confident in their assertions. Some examples: forensic linguists found that Watkins played a role in helping write 8kun posts from “Q,”[2], believed by many to have been responsible for the “Q” persona[3],Q is probably Ron Watkins[4], Ron Watkins, the man purported to be an architect of the QAnon conspiracy theory[5], etc.

"One or both of the Watkinses know the identity of, or are themselves, 'Q'", is a bad summary of the state of knowledge right now: Ron Watkins is probably Q, and Jim Watkins probably isn't. Any thoughts on how to reword this? I don't want to hack away unilaterally on a statement that has nine citations attached to it. Endwise (talk) 08:58, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Watkins as QAnon

During a recent livestream, Null (creator of Kiwifarms and former 8chan dev) remarked that Ron Watkins is QAnon. I’ll try to find the video, but it might be worth stating that Frederick isn’t the only one who believes Q was involved with 8chan 216.9.110.4 (talk) 13:04, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What Null thinks about the matter is almost certainly irrelevant for this page. But I do agree that this article understates how confident we should be in believing that Ron Watkins was the person posting as Q; see the section above where I complain about that. Endwise (talk) 13:34, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]