This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania
This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
The contents of the Romula (castra) page were merged into Romula on 18 November 2017 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history.
No, it should not be merged. The principle is distinct articles for distinct things even those things are related. The quality of article has no role concerning the subjects. Saturnian (talk) 11:19, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge; the fort associated with a city can easily be discussed within the context of the city, particularly when the fort page is a long-standing stub. Discussion of the fort benefits from the context of the city page. So, this merge is clearly consistent with WP:MERGEREASON on the grounds of Context. There is no "principle [of] distinct articles for distinct things even those things are related". Klbrain (talk) 20:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
