Jump to content

Talk:Romeo Void/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 23:19, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:20, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    and a cover of Danish musician Jørgen Ingmann's popular instrumental song " Apache", "instrumental" or "track" would be better here, it is clearly not a "song".
    Suitably compliant with MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Well referenced, sources appear to be RS, no OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Good coverage without unnecessary trivia
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Image has suitable non-free use rationale, sound samples are compliant with Wikipedia criteria.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Just one minor issue, on hold for seven days.
    OK, all good now, listing as GA. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 17:06, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]