Talk:Romeo Void/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 23:19, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:20, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
and a cover of Danish musician Jørgen Ingmann's popular instrumental song " Apache", "instrumental" or "track" would be better here, it is clearly not a "song".

Suitably compliant with MoS
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Well referenced, sources appear to be RS, no OR
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Good coverage without unnecessary trivia
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Image has suitable non-free use rationale, sound samples are compliant with Wikipedia criteria.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Just one minor issue, on hold for seven days.

OK, all good now, listing as GA. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 17:06, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"song" -> "composition". Thanks! -- Noj r (talk) 17:04, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]