Talk:Romanoro

Edit request

I'am asking for the following to be removed from this (my) article:

1-all three of my pictures which Wikipedia is continuing to use without my permission,

2-Roads, See Also and History sections,

3-all references and links leading to lupidellavalle and consorziodeltartufo websites,

4- this phrase in parenthesis at the beginning of the article: "...(about 245 inhabitants in Winter, 740 inhabitants during Summer holiday, in the entire frazione)...",

5-and the "Comuni of the Province of Modena" template at the end of the article as this place isn't a Comune.--Sweetcorn (msg) 10:39, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Are these the same photographs mentioned in this post "About Gionataconti and his little novice "Romanoro" article"?  Question: If those are the same photographs that you uploaded 8 years ago, then the question is, what is the expiration time for pics uploaded under a GNU Free Documentation License? I'm not sure what that is. I think we would need to determine that before we could act on anything. I think in the original discussion 8 years ago it was never really determined whether you took these photographs yourself or not. That would need to be determined if we were to do anything about these photos. Needless to say, your recent vandalism and redirects of the article's page are not the appropriate way to have content removed. As far as it being a commune, it is located within one, Frassinoro.

 Spintendo  ᔦᔭ  06:59, 11 December 2017 (UTC). Additional text on 19:48, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

This diff shown here 1. better illustrates the problem behind this bizarre back and forth editing. The diff is in Italian; the English translation is below:

I am a person who lives in this country here I wanted to ask if you could revise an article and make it similar to the capital of the municipality article because it is too large for a small village of only 2-3 houses. It seems to me a buffoon of no encyclopedic relevance, it only advertises the area, it makes me easily traceable from the ill-treated, and now everyone here is laughing at me. Since it's not allowed for me to change it, and the penalty would be a global block of my user from Wikipedia, I ask for help from you since you have contributed substantially. I ask you to do the following things: 1-remove my images that I no longer want to share with anyone much less with a few hundred people unknown and potentially hostile towards me a year, 2-remove the "See also" section, 3-remove the "Roads" and "History" sections, 4-remove all references to the websites lupidellavalle and consorziodeltartufo, 5-remove that joke at the beginning of the article that talks about the difference in inhabitants between summer and winter."--Sweetcorn (msg) 2:26 am, 10 December 2017, last Sunday (4 days ago) (UTC−8)

The context here is that this editor under another account created this article and added some of the information in it 8 years ago, and due to community feedback, has since come to regret creating it. I wonder if there are potential harrassment concerns perhaps this content could be either re-written or taken to AfD for removal? To Sweetcorn, I apologize for putting this here, but I'm afraid it was needed to help editors understand what the motivation was behind this reverting. I hope this helps in some way.  Spintendo  ᔦᔭ  20:17, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

i have removed the following information from the history section:

Matilda of Tuscany
by Bernini in the Saint Peter's Basilica (Rome).

"First official documents mentioning the village date back to 1204 as Armanorium. In fact the "Armanorium" term can be traced back up to the presence of Arimanni (800 AD), Lombard soldiers to whom were given estates and lots in strategic territory with both agricultural and defensive purpose.

Once the Lombard Kingdom of northern Italy was conquered by Charlemagne, the whole Dolo valley was given in administration to medieval Rubbiano settlement; it remained to the latter until 1071, when local ruler Beatrice of Lorena, mother of Matilda of Tuscany, gave the Dolo valley in administration to the Frassinoro Hospice, thus creating by then the Frassinoro Benedictine Abbey.

In 1204 the community of Romanoro, and all other inhabitants of Dolo valley, vowed loyalty to the town of Reggio Emilia (which is the oldest written note about Romanoro hamlet), thus remaining outside the dominion of the local Frassinoro Benedictine Abbey, located in the nearby Dragone valley. This division still holds in the roman apostolic catholic church administration, with the Dolo valley mainly belonging to the diocese of Reggio Emilia, and the Dragone valley belonging to the archdiocese of Modena. On the other hand, both the Dolo and Dragone valley belong to the Frassinoro municipality.

At the beginning of the 14th century, together with Morsiano and Fontanaluccia, it was part of the Muschioso stronghold, administrated by the Lords of Dallo. According to the 1315 census, Cerreto, Panigale and Montale villages were part of the Romanoro comune. The Dallo were followed by the Montecuccoli family, who controlled the Badia land until 1426, when they were replaced by the Estensi of Montefiorino (a branch of whom was Duke of Modena and Reggio). At the beginning of the 16th century the mountains were ravaged in the course of the war between the House of Este and the Papal States."

References

and replaced it with a link to Emilia-Romagna#History as the only reference cited is to a personal website and is not useable (also looks like personal research), when reliable references are found then it can be returned. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:20, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

and deleted the "245 inhabitants in Winter, 740 inhabitants during Summer" words from the lead as citation doesn't back this (also 2001 stats reference in the infobox shows a pop. of 54 and having a look on gmaps Romanoro appears to have about 80 buildings, no camping sites holiday parks so "740 in summer" looks highly unlikely. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:58, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

hi Sweetcorn and Spintendo, re the 3 pictures, they were placed under "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.", a summary of that license is here, reading here, it appears that Sweetcorn cannot stop the images being used, i would suggest, though, that they ask what, if anything, can be done at the wikicommons village pump. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:48, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you Coolabahapple your help is much appreciated. Thank you very much to Indy beetle as well for your time and input on this matter. Regards,  Spintendo  ᔦᔭ  17:55, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

no probs. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:47, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

external links

i have just deleted the two external links of this article as the 1st one was dead (led the reader nowhere), and the second one led to a personal website, inappropriate for wp. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:07, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

28-APR-2018 expanded edit summary

References which had been removed from the article per the above post from DEC 2017 by Coolabahapple were seemingly returned to the article by InternetArchiveBot. These references were not meant for the article, which is why they were removed. I am reverting the bot's actions, and removing those references once again. A subsequent edit made by another editor to correct the usage of a date (i.e., the 14th of November) was removed by my revert of InternetArchiveBot, so I've manually placed this change back into the article to read as that editor intended it to, according to WP:DATESNO. Regards,   SPINTENDO          00:39, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Also note: my revert of InternetArchiveBot mentioned above inadvertently placed an expired protection template back into the article, which was not my intention. MusikBot has since then correctly removed it for me. FYI.   SPINTENDO          00:44, 29 April 2018 (UTC)