Talk:Lists of fictional species

untitled comments from 2006

It is linked from the Main Page at the moment, but I think this should be AfD'd as redundant given Category:Lists of fictional species. violet/riga (t) 08:50, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I second that. -Quiddity 19:22, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it is a bit redundant —M in un ^Spiderman 14:49, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

untitled comments from 2011

How can I add a relevant link to this page without it being deleted by a bot? --Dyga19 (talk) 04:25, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 January 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 03:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of fictional species → Lists of fictional specimens – Instead of whole species, these lists mostly describe single speciess′ individuals. 5.59.53.17 (talk) 14:14, 15 January 2021 (UTC) —Relisting. Jack Frost (talk) 07:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The article seems to be q list of mixed individual specimens and groups of species. An article split might be necessary. Showiecz (talk) 12:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.