This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
I'm at odds with the sources (not for the first time). The museum source, under Political trouble, says "... a number of faulty issues of the 260s...", but no mention is made of them in the Treasure Report. In the Treasure Report, it says, page 122, "Coins of the "improved" issues..." – does the museum source mean to comment on the Aurelian monetary reformation which improved the minting of coins, or were there some minting errors? How does anyone else read it? – B.hotep •talk• 22:03, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
