Talk:Roger (American Dad!)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Roger (American Dad!) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 December 2015. The result of the discussion was procedural keep.

Television Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation Mid‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comedy Mid‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

This article was nominated for merging with List of American Dad! characters on 20 December 2015. The result of the discussion was Not merged.

Untitled

Crazily crufty. Needs a rewrite or merge (too in-universe) badly. dfg 05:23, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Rogercameo.png

Image:Rogercameo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Character's Basis

Seth McFarlane's said in interviews that both Roger and Stewie are based on gay actors from the 20th century. It seems to me that the actor Alan Sues is the basis for this character (Roger). Can anyone confirm? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.235.39.36 (talk) 20:02, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. It's obviously Paul Lynde Roger is based on. -- AvatarMN (talk) 20:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some have noted the similarity to Roger and Cleveland Brown, and some were under the impression Roger was voiced by Mike Henry, not MacFarlane. 12.41.204.3 (talk) 19:34, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roger = Cleveland Brown?!? Who are these 'some' who claim a similarity?

Brown is another fictional character
His race is very obviously different from Roger's
His character isn't even from the same series

The two characters are very different on so many other levels: voice register and intonation, bitchiness, sexuality...

Centrepull (talk)

I always thought Roger was based on Charles Nelson Reilly... The voice, the acting, the changing outfits... It all makes sense! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.237.71.29 (talk) 17:58, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnam/2e French-Indochinese war veteran Member

Roger isn't enlisted in the Category of Fictional Veterans he said in a episode that he was a VietCong member.

Roger's inclusion in that category would require an on-screen appearance. Roger has been known to be a pathological liar. 12.41.204.3 (talk) 19:34, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: In the episode In Country... Club (S6E1) it's confirmed that Roger did; in fact; serve in the Vietnam War, fighting for the Vietcong. In a Vietnam War reenactment, he takes Stan Smith as a POW (Stan is also hinted to have served in the Army at some point before his career with the CIA) after Steve Smith falls asleep on watch, resulting in the base camp being raided and the soldiers killed in their sleep. Roger tortures Stan for the parental lock code so he could make a PayPerView purchase for $499.00. Special:Contributions/Ensydeouz BlvxkByrd (talk) 03:07, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Immortal?

Is Roger essentially immortal or just has a longer lifespan? (JoeLoeb (talk) 17:39, 6 May 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Roger is not Immortal, his lifespan is just significantly longer. He said he's a little over 1000 years and he's also said his species has no bones, lives on a planet that's below freezing and that he had about 9000 years left of his life. So his species lives for about 10000-11000 years. (User:Ensydeouz BlvxkByrd (talk) 02:58, 5 January 2023 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.112.254.157 (talk) [reply]

Sexuality

How can we make judgments on "his" sexualtiy (possible bi-sexual or gay) considering "he" is not human, and we do not know the classification for sex (male or female) in "his" species. Roger may just be attracted to all humans that fit "his" idea of an ideal mate. Since we do not know how gender is differentiated in "his" species (if it exists at all) I dont think we can definitivly say that "he" is attracted to members of the same sex. I find the gender classifications applied to Roger by the Smith family (when they refer to the alien with male pronouns) to be irrelevant as the Smith's, in a similar way to the post WWII cargo cults, are operationalizing the existance of Roger within their own world view and, as such, apply gender to the alien where none may exist.

Because it's a fictional portrayal and is written along certain lines. It's not like it's an exploration of non-human sexuality, or the bizarre doings of some real-life alien we can't fit into our existing models; the TV writers portray him one way or another for one purpose or another. Don't let the feint sci-fi conceit confuse that.~Zythe^{Talk to me!} 01:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Roger calls Stan, and Francine- Staniel and Franiel.

Where should that be added? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.150.148.121 (talk) 15:47, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No where, it is trivial CTJF83 chat 20:17, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gender=Male?

I removed the male classification from the gender category in the character infobox because even though the smiths refer to roger as "he" or "him", roger doesn't have a penis and gender classifications shouldn't apply anyways because the sexual characteristics of rogers species aren't known.

I`ve reverted it. The show refers to him as a male and I don`t think we should be overruling that based only on our personal analysis of him appeareance.--76.66.189.59 (talk) 05:28, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with keeping it listed male, and 76.66.189.59's interpretation. CTJF83 18:55, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In the episode where Roger was a member of the hockey team that won the gold medal, he says that the steroids he took shrank his penis.

File:Roger and Klaus.JPG Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Roger and Klaus.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:16, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disguises

While early Roger was unable and forbidden to leave the house (which is mentioned in the article) and had a hard time, finding a way, that he could be around people (other than the Smith family). Numerous episodes, such as Family Affair, The Best Christmas Story Never Told and Weiner of Our Discontent showcases Roger in the 50's, 70's and 90's, walking around in public wearing disguises. This is a retcon, that should be mentioned in the article. --coq87rouge —Preceding undated comment added 16:42, 8 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Not necessarily a retcon...it's a sometimes-absurd animated comedy with sci-fi overtones...we have no reason to assume that the restrictions placed on Roger while living in the Smith home applied at other times. Despite his bizarre morphology he is readily able to fool others - even the Smiths - regarding his identity. Without others' interference he would have been able to exist in any period undetected.PurpleChez (talk) 02:39, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Roger for President

This edit was reverted. It was unsourced but I have found sources (not independent, though) that say the information is valid. There are other sources that don't meet the defintion of reliable. The IP just had trouble wording the edit correctly and didn't bother with sources.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:05, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Homosexuality

"Roger is revealed to have had a homosexual romantic relationship with another member of his alien race"

I wouldn't say he is homosexual, since he doesn't seem to have a classic gender. On his races spaceship we don't see female versions of his race, so I'd assume his race only has one gender. 93.228.186.178 (talk) 12:21, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He's Pansexual. Andrea Carter (at your service | my good deeds) 11:39, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos

This article is extremely well-written. Far too often, articles about prime time animation are clogged with endless, minor details and other fancruft. ("In S01E04 Biff reports that his favorite color is blue. In S01E05 he mentions that he is allergic to onions...") The article maintains an encyclopedic tone despite the fact that it deals with a pansexual, degenerate 1600-year-old alien with Paul Lynde's voice. Huzzah!!PurpleChez (talk) 02:31, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Roger (American Dad!). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:15, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Line about Kim Possible

At the end of the intro paragraph, there is the line ''In the episode “dressed down” he briefly mentions Disney character Kim Possible’s name.''. Would it be okay if i removed this? I'm not really sure how it is relevant to Roger as a character Spiderwinebottle (talk) 14:48, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]