Talk:Rogate

Web site squatting

It seems that rogatevillage.co.uk has suffered a lapse-squatting event. I have removed the link and reached out to a member of the community who is involved in the village's online presence to ask which site to link to in the mean time.

A WayBack Machine entry in May 2013 suggests the site was left fallow. WHOIS records state it was registered on 22nd May 2015 so I assume the domain was not renewed.

Simplypeachy (talk) 19:32, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New web site link added

Simplypeachy (talk) 10:46, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.

Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie Rake, West Sussex to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 22:55, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The link to Rake within this article redirects back on itself, here. So someone who has better editing skills than I, needs to fix it. SovalValtos (talk) 19:18, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rogate and Rake

Rake is certainly worthy of its own article, but needs some research. I might have a go at it when I have time, as I am very familiar with the area. Rogate and Rake are completely separate villages some distance apart, the former on the A272 and the latter on the old A3. Hillbrow (on the A3) is a southern development from Rake, and all three settlements go back quite a way as they lie on historic roads. Hillbrow is actually more geographically associated with Liss, though Liss is in Hampshire and a different parish. The Rogate article needs expanding, as there is plenty more to say about it. Maybe start by breaking into sections? Tony Holkham (talk) 22:28, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Before making any decision to split Rake and Rogate into separate pages I think some development of the history of the two combined is needed, as I am guessing that they were at one time more closely associated than they have been in recent times. Recentism could be a snare. Just a thought.SovalValtos (talk) 02:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Useful references

Here are some references (with further citations) to expand this article -

This is from the first 3 pages of a Google search on "Rogate history". Tony Holkham (talk) 14:25, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rogate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110608075926/http://www.westsussex.gov.uk/communityandliving/census2001/pop_parish_summary.pdf to http://www.westsussex.gov.uk/communityandliving/census2001/pop_parish_summary.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:17, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]