Jump to content

Talk:Roderic Dallas/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:08, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Comment Could you put some alt text on the main pic? Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:19, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, there's always something...! Tks, done. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:24, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
On behalf of Georgejdorner and myself, tks for review, Hawkeye! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:47, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]