Talk:Rocket sled
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Is anyone of the impression that a dummy and not Strapp is in the chair in the picture? I found the following on Wikipedia's article on Murphy's Law: "Initial tests used a humanoid crash test dummy strapped to a seat on the sled, but subsequent tests were performed by John Paul Stapp." Philolexica 23:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- i don't think a dummy would be able to stay in that position under acceleration —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.110.223 (talk) 20:04, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Bearing
[edit]None of the references I've found say that the slippers employ an air bearing. It seems to be just a plain bearing in fact.
See: http://www.marsroverblog.com/dyn/reply/59210/93
Sounds like they just paint it with a 'lubricating' paint and it skips along the track.
I did find some research for air bearings for this, but it doesn't sound like it panned out.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 01:14, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Table
[edit]What is wrong with the last row? Seems illogical to me.--Bigbossfarin (talk) 09:04, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Rocket sled. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070720112641/http://www.rttc.army.mil/resources/ta1.htm to http://www.rttc.army.mil/resources/ta1.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081212165131/http://www.martin-baker.co.uk/Contact-Us/UK.aspx to http://www.martin-baker.co.uk/Contact-Us/UK.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041016124712/http://www.improb.com/airchives/paperair/volume9/v9i5/murphy/murphy1.html to http://www.improb.com/airchives/paperair/volume9/v9i5/murphy/murphy1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:31, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
John Paul Stapp, mach 8.5?
[edit]John Paul Stapp, mach 8.5? I my great nephew is John Paul Stapp's Great great nephew. And I was looking up some history. I'm familiar with Stapp's name because I am friends with Joe Kittinger who worked and sweated with him back in the day, and Joe gave me the book and I couldn't put it down.
so now that young James Stapp is about six years old I thought I'd start looking up some things about his great great uncle. And I came across this claim of mach 8.5 which is 8 1/2 times the speed of sound at sea level is about 7000+ mph . I don't remember the exact speed of sound at sea level, I know it's 700 and something but I do know that nobody went 7000 mph anywhere but space. so I'm gonna guess the decimal point's in the wrong place and it was mach .85 and, I don't know what the actual number is. and I can't reach Joe at this moment, and I don't have access to my book , I just thought I would call this to attention.
And as I am not sure of the actual record he set, I'm not going to edit it by just moving the decimal point and then turns out that it's not .85 at all, so I will leave editing up to Wikipedia peeps, thank you,
Laurel (just the facts) Nichols. lol 73.46.156.152 (talk) 02:02, 6 June 2022 (UTC)