Talk:Rocket (band)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 7 November 2017. The result of the discussion was delete and redirect. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rocket (band) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]How much reliable fact does this page have? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.38.207.225 (talk • contribs) 13:27, 4 November 2007
Image
[edit]- I have an image, but I'm really slow and don't understand the guidelines, and if someone would like to add it to the article that'd be great. I'd rather not get in trouble. From left to right: Lauren C., Chelsea, Kristin, Peaches, and Lauren. This was found on their facebook: [1]. Image: [2] 98.206.23.154 (talk) 02:52, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Notice: This article does not verifiably establish WP:MUSIC
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Ambox_warning_blue.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_blue.svg.png)
In my opinion, this article either does not verifiably satisfy the Notability criteria for Music, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.
Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable sources in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:TeamRock (talk · contribs), and other recent contributors to this article, to make some constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.
To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings ... I realize that some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case.
Happy Editing! — 138.88.32.143 (talk · contribs) 21:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
I have removed the [[Category:Flagged articles]]
from
the message above
… it was flagged at least two months ago by Some Other Editor,
but the current version looks fine to me. Avicennasis @ 03:30, 8 April 2010 (UTC)