Talk:Rock with U

Rock with U has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 3, 2014. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rock with U article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 2008-02-04. The result of the discussion was keep.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Janet Jackson Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Janet Jackson, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Janet Jackson and associated groups or individuals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Janet JacksonWikipedia:WikiProject Janet JacksonTemplate:WikiProject Janet JacksonJanet Jackson
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

untitled

please someone delete this article,as for there is no reliable source that this is a confirmed single.....please delete it..

This article should be deleted,as it does not have any reliable sources that states its going to the next official single of the album........

i dont know why its taking so long for it to be deleted....the article "touch my body" had the same reference as this one,and it was deleted several times.....and in this article its the exact same situation,and yet it still exists.....i dont get it...... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brexx (talk • contribs) 21:01, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

why isnt someone saying something about this article....it doesnt have any reliable source nor it is confirmed as the next single..............,why only "touch my body"....this is so unfair....wikipedia,im so disappointed...... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brexx (talk • contribs) 21:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

both songs arent confirmed to be singles and dont have any reliable sources,so why should one of them stay and the other go...if one stays the other should also stay and vice versa.....but this is just unfair.....i just dont understand please someone explain....if wikipedia keeps this article,then its so lowering its standards... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brexx (talk • contribs) 21:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

iTunes Speaks For Itself
The bottom line is, the song has already been released as a digital download, is identified as a single, and it's verifiable on iTunes at the following URL: http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewArtist?id=271066088. Even though it hasn't been confirmed by a more solid source like Billboard, it's only a matter of time before it is. So why waste time trying to derail progress on somethingi that's going to be accomplished anyway? Souldier77 (talk) 06:17, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rock with U/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Prism (talk · contribs) 10:36, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! prism^△ 10:36, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lead & infobox

Prose

"Stamile and Dupri" → "the last two"
Is the "for the kids" quote necessary here? I guess it could be paraphrased or substituted with 'for its members' (referring to the gay community).
Perhaps you could address the Bubbling Under positions (at least the Under Hot 100)

Music and lyrics

Prose

"Electroboogie" could be changed to "electro groove", it's too casual.
Is MWZA reliable?
"herself" will be easier to understand if substituted by Jackson
Riffs is in plural form, so "it" in this sentence is gramatically incorrect.
"Building on the original's bed of synthesized chord changes, the producers layer in swirling keyboards, vocoder whispers and the singer's own distended murmurs." — blatant copyvio; what is the original?
If the song talks about an "erotic proposition", what relation does it have with the gay community?

Files

As a rule of thumb, the length of a sample should be approximately 10% of the song's original length. In this case, 23 seconds is the maximum. The caption could be rephrased a bit just so it doesn't repeat what's in the section. At least so they aren't the exact same words.

Critical reception

Suggestion: How about merging this section with the next one, and reorder the information so it goes "Release and reception" (that being the title too)? It's just that the Release section is a bit small.

Music video

Suggestion: Merge this section with Live performance, change the title and explain how she was dressed during that tour and what she did during it.

Almost all

Done, except the live performance informations which I didn't find. Alex ^{talk page!} 23:01, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]