Talk:Rock Phish

Talk:Rock Phish Kit

Who or What Is 'Rock Phish' and Why Should You Care?

According to this report from PCWorld.com, Who or What Is 'Rock Phish' and Why Should You Care?, just about everything in the current article is false. The article needs to be completely rewritten and moved to Rock Phish. ^Blank ^Verse 08:05, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Precisely my thoughts. So, while leaving it very much still a stub, I have both left the citation to the pre-existing elements and added information cited form Infoworld.

This is very much simple copy-editing; I am not a content expert in this topic, so I simply took material from the published source and precised snippets. This article will benefit form a content expert, so I will add the {{expert}} tag to it. Fiddle Faddle 17:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Updated link: http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,128175-c,networksecurity/article.html FWIW.-- era (Talk | History) 22:29, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

this article should be deleted —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.183.81.226 (talk • contribs)

Detailed source

The VeriSign® iDefense® Intelligence Operations Team published a report which details Rockphish (a way of attacking rather than the programs or criminals behind it) on pages 20 and 21:

The Russian Business Network: Rise and Fall of a Criminal ISP

Originally Published: June 27, 2007

Updated: March 3, 2008

An iDefense Security Report

http://blog.wired.com/defense/files/iDefense_RBNUpdated_20080303.doc

You can also view it using Google's HTML view of the cached document.

84user (talk) 00:22, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brutal update

Have just ripped a lot of poor material out, and added new refs. Probably needs a bit of work, but at least it makes some sense now... Snori (talk) 06:54, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]