Jump to content

Talk:Robyn Regehr/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:32, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


This article is in decent shape, do a couple of fixes, it becomes Good article material.

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    Well done, though, I would consider having a consistency with "Regehr", it's too repetitive, specifically in the NHL section.
    Check.
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    You might want to add accessdates to a couple of sources.
    Check [on that too].
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    If you can get these two issues, I'll be more than happy to promote the article. Good luck!

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:32, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Both should be fixed now, thanks! Resolute 00:09, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome! Thank you to Resolute for getting the concerns I left, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:04, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]