Talk:Roboteer

Robotics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

The

The article has some useful information not commonly available in other sources, but has a conversational tone that needs to be worked on. I recommend providing direct links to IMDB sources rather then "try typing". The signature and email at the bottom is a nice attempt to provide more information, but doesn't fit with the rest of the feel of Wikipedia and may even be regarded as a vanity page by some.

ParticularlyEvil 23:32, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article is written in a colloquial style and could be significantly improved. My suggestion is to use the "Roboticist" (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Roboticist) article as an example. I think the words "Roboteer" and "Roboticist" are synonims; although the latter may sound more formal. Because of this reason, incorporating the information about "Roboteer" in the "Roboticist" article should be considered.

Robot 11:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Attention needed

notability
merge?
check for deletion or expansion

Chaosdruid (talk) 05:41, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]