Talk:Robiatherium

Robiatherium has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 5, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Passed. -- Zoo Blazer 01:57, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Robiatherium/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: PrimalMustelid (talk · contribs) 15:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: ZooBlazer (talk · contribs) 00:52, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I should have have my comments posted soon. -- Zoo Blazer 00:52, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Just curious, could the skeletal image not be used in the infobox?

Add alt text to both images

The genus name derives from the locality of Robiac in France where some of its fossil were described plus the Greek θήρ/therium meaning "beast" or "wild animal" – Need some commas, plus change fossil to fossils, so something like this overall --> "The genus name derives from the locality of Robiac in France, where some of its fossils were described, plus the Greek θήρ/therium, meaning "beast" or "wild animal"."
He said that in 1978, he then defined – Reword this so it's not he, he
he determined recently – What is considered recently?
belonged not to the Xiphodontidae but the Anoplotheriinae – Add a comma after Xiphodontidae
Tylopoda, along with the Amphimerycidae and Xiphodontidae split earlier – Add a comma after Xiphodontidae
and another work – Maybe be more specific, or at least word it differently
focusing most specifically on – You can just remove "most specifically"
Link Grande Coupure extinction event

No copyright issues detected and spotchecks came back fine. Overall, a nice article. Just a few things to clean up. -- Zoo Blazer 01:21, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Implemented all suggestions, let me know if there's anything else that I need to do or missed. PrimalMustelid (talk) 01:48, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me. Happy to promote. -- Zoo Blazer 01:53, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.