Jump to content

Talk:Robert fitzRoger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DYK

[edit]

Template:Did you know nominations/Robert fitzRoger Ealdgyth - Talk 15:20, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"fitzRoger"

[edit]

"fitzRoger" is not a surname, as used in the current version of this article. -Wetman (talk) 11:16, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But it's commonly used as a functional surname by historians. It's perfectly fine to use these sorts of patronymics as surnames for Wikipedia's purposes. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:13, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Robert fitzRoger/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 16:32, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Gog the Mild (talk) 17:19, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • "was an Anglo-Norman nobleman" I can't find this in the main article.
    • This one is going to have to be "the sky is blue" type of thing. He held lands and offices in Anglo-Norman England and he wasn't clergy - so the fact that he held office makes him ipso-facto a nobleman in this time. "He was considered a baron" is pretty much the big clue there. Ealdgyth (talk) 19:35, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, yeah. I just want you to use the phrase "Anglo-Norman" in the main article. (Or remove it from the lead.) We both know it is a given, but the rules say that if you put it in the summary - the lead - you should put at least the same information in the article.
It's there now. Ealdgyth (talk) 20:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed