Talk:Robert Murray M'Cheyne
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Robert Murray M'Cheyne article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Works
[edit]I intend to insert a section in which to list M'Cheyne's published works. Many of his sermons and sermon notes have been republished in the last 10 years. DFH 20:21, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
References
[edit]Also to be added are references to various biographies of M'Cheyne, including two published within the last few years. DFH 20:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Robert Murray M'Cheyne → Robert Murray McCheyne — In McCheyne's time it was commonplace to use an inverted apostrophe to spell the prefix "Mc". There is no inverted apostrophe in the ASCII set, and people are spelling his name with an ordinary apostrophe to represent the archaic form; however, this is bound to lead to confusion, since people will assume his name is pronounced "Mmmcheyne". —Marnanel 11:56, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Survey
[edit]- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''
or*'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- SupportBrian0324 14:59, 21 August 2007 (UTC) Much less confusing to pronounce - and not much bigger
- Oppose Spell it as it is spelt. Note that M' is an old-fashioned form of Mc/Mac if you think you have to. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 16:58, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. External links use M'Cheyne -- add an explanation/pronunciation in the intro line if necessary. (If this passes, should we move Ming?) — AjaxSmack 20:03, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- Any additional comments:
- So how is the name pronounced? —Angr/talk 16:36, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it to be moved. --Stemonitis 17:06, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
[edit]This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:52, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Robert Murray M'Cheyne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101112070202/http://net.bible.org/daily.php?plan=CHYENE to http://net.bible.org/daily.php?plan=CHYENE
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:19, 20 December 2017 (UTC)