Talk:Robert Jolicoeur

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Equine Low‑importance

	Horses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Equine, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of articles relating to horses, asses, zebras, hybrids, equine health, equine sports, etc. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the barn.EquineWikipedia:WikiProject EquineTemplate:WikiProject Equineequine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Would really like to bring this with in the standards, between Robert and his brother Pierre the two have done a lot to promote and improve equestrian sport in North America, their individual contributions should be recognized. It doesn't need to read as an advertisement any assistance in this direction will help. This is my first wiki.

It is for intents and purposes a place holder, a jump in point. I attempting to compile better biographical information in a comprehensive fashion, it is a daunting task that I figure won't happen all in one shot.

As for references, I'm not certain how one goes about referencing before a certain date for which little information exists.

As for wikifying, it is my intent to do so as I go along, once I figure it out.

As for more neutral, I'm not certain how one talks about achievements that way, I am not Robert Jolicoeur if that helps understand that I am not writing for advertising purposes.

Well, if there are newspaper articles or books that reference the information that is fine too. The materials don't need to be on the web, though that certainly helps with other editors verifying the content. Don't worry if you don't know the format for adding references, worst case you can just add them at the bottom (or right next to the fact they support, in parentheses) in plain text and someone can enter them in the right format. In my opinion, the language used is neutral enough. Some of the language is a little peacock-y, but as you say its hard to talk about accomplishments without using positive words. Hope that helps. Syrthiss (talk) 13:04, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, perhaps if some one has an example of a lesser known individual, ie has a high public profile within a single community (In Robert's it's equestrian) but not an actor, singer, writer, or politician, that has well put together wiki that can be referenced as a boilerplate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Docbosh (talk • contribs) 20:31, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]