Talk:Robert James Carlson

Style Question

Lots of articles on Bishops have a box on "Style" or "Manner of Address" but not this one. Is there some reason why not?

Also, when is it right to use the academic degrees in address (e.g. The Most Reverend First M. Last, D.D., J.D." or whatever?)

NPOV

I think this is NPOV: "after they resisted Burke's directive to conform to the organizational structure which most St. Louis parishes now operate under (which gives more sway over some important issues to the archbishop and his appointed pastor, and where the assets of the parish are considered part of the wider archdiocese)."

The "organizational structure which most St. Louis parishes now operate under" is the same organizational structure most Catholic parishes operate under everywhere, indeed the one envisioned by Canon Law first codified in 1917. This is not something peculiar to St. Louis or to the Archbishop Emeritus.

I'd suggest something like this: "Archbishop Carlson has attempted to reconcile the board and membership of St. Stanislaus with the Archdiocese. The matter remains unresolved."

The St. Stanislaus Wikipedia article has problems too, but it ought to be linked here and I'd say it is enough citation for this bit of history.

What do moderators think?

Untitled

The "Culture of Life" section here is clearly NPOV, but I'm not knowledgeable enough about the subject to fix it myself. Is there another way this information could be phrased?

NPOV

Can you be more specific about what you find biased in this section? Or can you make a suggestion?

"Carlson is considered theologically conservative,[6] but also genial and kind with an approachable manner.[1]" Just because it is cited--to a dead link, by the way--doesn't mean it's not editorializing. btw, going to delete the second half of that sentence. J1.grammar natz (talk) 00:52, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Why is there no reference in this article of the fact that this archbishop claims he didn't know that sexual abuse of children was a crime (https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/religion/st-louis-archbishop-carlson-said-hes-not-sure-he-knew-sexual-abuse-was-a-crime/2014/06/10/cad0614a-f0b5-11e3-85d2-cda8aebfefe0_story.html)? This is beyond shocking and not mentioned. [unsigned user 29 Sept 2015] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.222.208.252 (talk) 09:35, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Carlson crest.jpg

Image:Carlson crest.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:50, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Carlson.jpg

Image:Carlson.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Current status

Archbishop-elect Carlson has been appointed to the see of St. Louis but has not assumed office. I cannot locate a date for his installation. Until he is installed, which could be a month or two away, the Archbishop-elect remains bishop of Saginaw and his tenure at St. Louis does not begin. For evidence that he is properly referred to as Archbishop-elect, see the Archdiocesan website, http://www.archstl.org/ . For an illustration of the difference/delay between appointment and installation (or ordination), see http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/bishop/bcarlson.html . Eric Ewanco (talk) 17:44, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Actually, the diocese of Saginaw is now vacant because Bishop Carlson is appointed to another diocese. He is Administrator of Saginaw which is different than Bishop of Saginaw which is now, as I said, a vacant see. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inpectore (talk • contribs) 18:17, 22 April 2009 (UTC)