Talk:Robert Greene (American author)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

File:Robert Greene.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Robert Greene.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:32, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Robert Greene (American author). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121113062422/http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2012/11/09/mastery-robert-greene/ to http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2012/11/09/mastery-robert-greene/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:20, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

link redirects to this same article

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Laws_of_Human_Nature link needs removal.^^^^ 79.153.137.219 (talk) 16:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable article content, unsure how to handle

A lot of this article seems to be made up of statements that Greene has made about himself in interviews (for example, the claim about the number of languages he speaks). It's verifiable that he's said these things, but not necessarily verifiable that they are accurate.

Additionally, as per the note at the top of the page, some of these descriptions of his books read like advertising copy. Does the article need detailed descriptions of his different books about power, or is a summary of his usual subject matter enough?

I'm a very new Wikipedia editor, and while I instinctively feel like there's some promotional fluff in this article that shouldn't be here, I wanted to see what other editors thought. Sorry if this is out of line. Thanks. OroborosCackling (talk) 08:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]