This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic
I believe the links to Romanian diaspora and Romanian exonyms should be removed. My reasons for this are: 1) The content in those articles have nothing to do with the city. The exonym article doesn't have a translation for the name of the city, and there is currently nothing in the city's article to suggest that there is a significant number of Romanians in the city. 2) There is no reason to add it here, as opposed to the articles of the other cities in the region. Is this city more Romanian than any of the others? It would make more sense to add them to Moravian Wallachia instead.--Frglz (talk) 19:32, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Is is one of the few (inf not the only one) in the Czech Republic that was once populated by the Romanian population. As a legacy to that there is Wallachian Open-Air Museum, a skansen that contains traditional Wallachian houses and farms from the 18th-20th centuries. Adrian (talk) 21:25, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's exactly my point. Romanian diaspora and Romanian exonyms have nothing to do with either Moravian Wallachians or Roznov pod Radhostem, so I replaced those links with one to Moravian Wallachia, which does an adequate job of explaining the Vlachs' Romanian origins. I don't see the point in keeping those two links.--Frglz (talk) 04:07, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
