Jump to content

Talk:Riyad-us Saliheen Brigade of Martyrs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mysterious statement

[edit]

Later in the same year [2009] a wave of multiple "special operations" (suicide bombings) in Chechnya and the neighbouring republic of Ingushetia killed scores of policemen and several civilians, and critically injured the Ingush president Yunus-bek Yevkurov.

Possibly, someone could look for sources to prove or disprove this mysteriously appeared comment. ellol (talk) 22:02, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here and other links from the same article on ruwiki. Still I removed the thing, since it was inconsistent with other sources. Same with bombing of Nevsky express. These guys boast about terrorism acts they never committed. Anything by kavkaz.org must be checked against other sources.Biophys (talk) 03:52, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
All poorly sourced materials were removed. I have checked previously that the claims were sourced to publications in Russian press (see this article on ruwiki), but most of the claims actually contradict other sources, as I just realized.Biophys (talk) 18:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If anyone can reliably source each specific claim, please do.Biophys (talk) 18:51, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
More source checking: http://www.jamestown.org/single/?no_cache=1&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=35214 (Suicide Attacker Battalion Resurfaces), this is Reuters, http://www.jamestown.org/single/?no_cache=1&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=34290 New Tensions Surface in Ossetian-Ingush Relations, and that's definitely an Islamic site.Biophys (talk) 01:50, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mysterious article

[edit]

This whole article is a sham of cobbled together poor facts & references made to look legitimate & add legitimacy to other wikipedia articles. I think this and several similar articles are being manipulated for the intent of inciting violence. Jeff Carr (talk) 15:37, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I partly agree. Why one should place absurd claims (sourced to the rebels!) in WP articles if a reliable source tells "no evidence"? But unfortunately, I can not edit these articles after receiving my topic ban. So, please fix yourself whatever you want.Biophys (talk) 16:37, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.kavkazcenter.com/eng/content/2010/02/17/11434.shtml
    Triggered by \bkavkazcenter\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:39, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Riyad-us Saliheen Brigade of Martyrs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]