Talk:RiskMetrics

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Focus

This will focus only on RiskMetrics the portfolio risk measurement methodologies, not on the company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pbenson60 (talk • contribs) 23:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is more important to focus on the company. UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:00, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Black Swan

The author of "The Black Swan" views RiskMetrics as a bunch of crap. Given the increasing importance of the "Black Swan" idea, it would be best to include a section on why he feels this way, or at least why using RiskMetrics makes driving using only your rear view mirror as safe.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=axo1oswvqx4s&refer=home from Jan 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.249.2.158 (talk) 12:28, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]