This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
An editor at an IP address and two other users seem to have taken an axe to this article, where a scalpel would have been much more useful, thus hacking out entire sections of useful and cited material. I'd like to add back in some selective parts. Bearian (talk) 16:31, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I placed back in some, but not all, of the material removed, without explanation, by an IP user who has since been blocked. I am holding off on further edits until the other regular users can chime in. I'll return to this discussion in a few days. Bearian (talk) 16:39, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am not going to undo all the edits of Andrew Gray and Scott Martin, because they fixed a lot of my errors -- and those of others. There has been intermittent vandalism and clean-up. However, I believe that a few parts really need to be put back into the article. In particular, I placed back parts about Blackstone, which I think are entirely relevant and well-sourced. I also think that removing the material on the Slaughter-House Cases was quibbling; the relationships between the 14th Amednment and the Rights of Englishmen are fairly well spelled out. What do others think? Bearian (talk) 16:50, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Bearian, if there is content that you, or other editors, think should be added back into this article then I would support being bold and adding it back in, that may be the best way to get input from other editors. Whizz40 (talk) 04:54, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
