Talk:Richard Minifie/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk) 13:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b (MoS):

• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

• It is stable.

  No edit wars etc.:

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail:

  Performed my usual minor copyedit; really, the only other thing is that I'm not sure the heading Post-military career and later life works as he underwent further military service in WWII, perhaps just Later career or Later life will do the trick, or even Business career and later life. However, I'm happy to pass as is and leave you to consider that - well done! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

  Thanks for the review and tweaks, Ian! Regarding the heading, when I put it in place I did consider it may be an issue the fact the he did serve in the Second World War. However, I wanted to pull away from the generic "Later life" heading as, really, he wasn't that old when the First World War, and his service, concluded and the heading implies quite a bit later/older. Also, he didn't really play a major role in the Second World War and the milling business was, basically, his sole post-war career. However, perhaps Post-war career and later life would be a slight improvement? Thanks, mate. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 13:35, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

  Works for me...! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

  Done. :) Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 14:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)