This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
I work for Mr Livingstone and we would prefer to remove certain items on the page that are infringing on his privacy. I had made an edit before and now it seems I can't. Not sure why anyone would continue to revert it back to an older version when the person the article is about has requested not too.
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Given that you have a clear conflict of interest, you should not attempt to edit the article yourself, but rather only use edit requests, even if the page's protection expires DannyS712 (talk) 15:46, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Presumably the changes that you are requesting are those made in your previous edit.[1] They are all backed by a citation from the Evening Standard.[2] Your edit summary stated that they were incorrect; in that case, you might ask the Standard to publish a retraction. Until then, the information is considered verifiable, and is valid content to remain in this article.