Talk:Richard Bentall

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Happiness as a disorder

Here's another book review. http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/article847447.ece

The review describes him as a seasoned controversialist.

It cites an article in which he suggests that happiness should be classed as a disorder, since it fits many of the criteria. I'm hoping he wasn't serious. 99.9.112.31 (talk) 19:22, 24 November 2010 (UTC)NotWillDecker[reply]

It should probably be taken just as seriously as equasy. Tijfo098 (talk) 19:34, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

His central point however (“There are no discrete mental illnesses”) doesn't seem so foolish if you consider the GWAS studies. Tijfo098 (talk) 19:40, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The happiness article is very clearly tongue-in-cheek. Bentall's standpoint is that the paradigm of classification of mental disorders in DSM-III et al is broken to the extent that it's a block to progress. So - yes - proposing classifying happiness as a disorder is intended to point up the inadequacy of the classification scheme as it currently stands, rather than being intended to be taken seriously in its own right. MatthewMorris (talk) 15:17, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Google books link

As to the deletions of the google books link ([1], [2]), this link appears to be potentially useful for the further work on the article. So at least let’s reserve this link on the talk page: Bentall, Richard (2009). Doctoring the mind: is our current treatment of mental illness really any good?. NYU Press. ISBN 0814791484. Psychiatrick (talk) 20:39, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Personal life

This sentence seems out of place in an objective biography: Personal life "He has two children, Fin and Keeva (twins from a previous relationship), who live in nearby Birkenhead and who are full of the respect for their father that teenagers are well known for." (Although I appreciate the irony, if that's what it is.) Doug1943 16:19, 24 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug1943 (talk • contribs)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richard Bentall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/article847447.ece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:28, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richard Bentall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140517074330/http://www.bangor.ac.uk/psychology/research/staff_profile.php?person=richard_bentall to http://www.bangor.ac.uk/psychology/research/staff_profile.php?person=richard_bentall

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:56, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]