Talk:Ricardo Alegría/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Ricardo Alegría. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 07:37, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Protected
The reason that this page is protected is because unregistered editors insist in adding unsourced edits with the intention of tarnishing the subjects accomplishments. Here in Wikipedia, we encourage everyone to edit articles, however said edits must be accompanied by reliable verifiable sources which must be cited. Tony the Marine (talk) 02:14, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
named as one of "Folklorists of Color"
In 2019, the American Folklore Society named Ricardo Alegría to their list of 25 "Folklorists of Color": American Folklore Society
- User:The Eloquent Peasant nor I could not find his name mentioned anywhere in the source cited. Tony the Marine (talk) 19:14, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- Here are the details: list of 25 American Folklorists of color
- @Pete unseth: Two things: next time when you add a claim like you did, which was reverted by two editors because you didn't put a reference, you can just add a reference to start with. It would have saved us a lot of effort time searching for something that you should reference yourself, when you add the claim. Your reverting my change was a result of your not adding the correct reference to begin with, right? Second, please sign your comments. Have a nice day. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 19:25, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Apologies for not signing or being precise.Pete unseth (talk) 20:33, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- It's okay. Have a nice day. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 20:37, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Apologies for not signing or being precise.Pete unseth (talk) 20:33, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Pete unseth: Two things: next time when you add a claim like you did, which was reverted by two editors because you didn't put a reference, you can just add a reference to start with. It would have saved us a lot of effort time searching for something that you should reference yourself, when you add the claim. Your reverting my change was a result of your not adding the correct reference to begin with, right? Second, please sign your comments. Have a nice day. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 19:25, 25 June 2020 (UTC)