Talk:RhythmOne/Archives/2011
 | This is an archive of past discussions about RhythmOne. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Independent?
This is said to be an independant startup. WHY then is this entry written from the same IP address as the one that has written the corporate-blurb entries for "Autonomy Systems" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.44.26.81 (talk • contribs) 14:38, October 12, 2005 (UTC).
DNS lookup
The domain name blinkz.com is owned by Autonomy Corp. Odd, since they're claiming to be an independant startup... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.44.26.81 (talk • contribs) 15:34, October 17, 2005 (UTC).
- Someone seems to have a bizarre agenda here.
- Blinkz is not Blinkx (different) and anyway Blinkz is not registered to Autonomy. Its also public knowledge that Autonomy has an option in Blinkx and provides the tech....and the CEO of Blinkx used used to work there...so you point is? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.83.111 (talk • contribs) 16:31, April 16, 2007 (UTC)
- Those comments are very old (I have now dated them), so this issue seems to be moot. -- Satori Son 17:27, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
misinformation?
Originally badged as an independent startup, Autonomy Corporation are now announcing that THEY are IPO-ing Blinkx. This is quite different to "having an option" in Blinkx. Very confused press statements flying about there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.44.26.81 (talk • contribs) 14:41, May 1, 2007 (UTC)
- What's the misinformation, exactly? What in the article is incorrect and what is the incentive for the company "lying" about it?
- You obviously have some sort of agenda and inside information, so please just come out and say what you think is really happening. No point in being all coy and clandestine trying to encourage us to follow your trail of breadcrumbs for the past eighteen months. -- Satori Son 17:19, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- And please do not blank discussion pages. -- Satori Son 18:19, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- I have advised this editor to seek assistance from WP:OVERSIGHT. -- Satori Son 16:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- And please do not blank discussion pages. -- Satori Son 18:19, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Changing Links to References
I changed the links to references as Wikipedia is not a collection of external links. I also removed red links to non-existent articles.Vrenator talk 09:35, 26 November 2011 (UTC)