Talk:Rhydycroesau

Shropshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shropshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Shropshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShropshireWikipedia:WikiProject ShropshireTemplate:WikiProject ShropshireShropshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History section is incomplete

The History section is comprised mainly of 19th-20th century stories of the church and rectory buildings, and the occupants of the rectory. Most statements, even those in quote marks, are unsourced. I have done some searching for sources of the village's history, finding only the site with evidence of Roman and early Anglo-Saxon settlement. Can anyone supply when the Welsh settled and named the village? Ellis Peters (Edith Pargeter) used the village for the setting of a key scene in her third novel, Monk's Hood, set in 1138, suggesting the village was well established then. The name is not in the Domesday Book indexes, as it was Wales, I suppose, the place William set out to conquer, once he had conquered England. Is there better evidence, like a local history? --Prairieplant (talk) 10:03, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rhydycroesau. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:28, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the saved pages, Wayback machine found them. --Prairieplant (talk) 05:49, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]