Talk:Rhodotus/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. I have done some minor copy editing. In my opinion, this is an excellent article and it passes the GA criteria. GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS criteria

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): Well reverenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): Cover major areas b (focused): Remains focused on topic

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: Neutral

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.: stable

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Pass

Another great article. Congratulations!

—Mattisse (Talk) 02:12, 15 June 2009 (UTC)