This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rodents, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rodents on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RodentsWikipedia:WikiProject RodentsTemplate:WikiProject RodentsRodent
Not being a mammalogist with access to proper literature, I am not the right one to undertake such a task, but I none the less am disturbed by the fact that there seems to be no discussion of the distinction between this species and R. pumilio, either its taxonomy, history, biology, range or significance, nor any indication of how to know which one you are dealing with, nor why you shouldn't care if you cannot find out. If nothing of the kind is forthcoming, what is the article for? JonRichfield (talk) 14:48, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
