Talk:Revolution Software/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 21:39, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: One found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 21:44, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Linkrot: None found. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:44, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- The lead does not adequately summarise the article, see WP:LEAD
- There is an undue use of promotional and POV language.
- The is a mixture of inline hyperlinks and citations.
- The prose is not very good, not "reasonably well written".
- Not well organised, information needs to be presented logically. Please read WP:MoS and subpages.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- What makes GameFAQs and Revfans reliable sources?
- Most of the sources are WP:Primary sources. This needs good third party sources.
- Wikipedia can not be used as a source.
- There is no sourcing for game releases in the Games section.
- Sources used for citations are also present in the external links section which is not permitted, see WP:EL
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- No mention of sales figures; no real indication of whether this company meets the WP:CORP guidelines.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Appears overly promotional
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- stable
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- The specific source of the image needs to be provided.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Shoddily put together, please read the good article criteria and make sure that this article meetrs them before renominating. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:06, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: