Talk:Revisionism (Marxism)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:Destroy soviet revisionists.jpg
[edit]
Image:Destroy soviet revisionists.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 13:08, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
#c-BetacommandBot-2008-02-25T13:08:00.000Z-Fair_use_rationale_for_Image:Destroy_soviet_revisionists.jpg){kind=link}
Oppose merger with historical revisionism
[edit]With reference to the {{Mergeto}} template added to this article.[1], I am against the merger of Marxist revisionism and historical revisionism. The concepts are distinct enough to have separate articles. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 08:20, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
What's the relation of this page to the New Left?--Ludvikus (talk) 20:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
It seems disputable to include the sentence "... as well as criticizing Karl Kautsky for his idea of state socialism.[2]", line 4, which attributes the idea of State Socialism to Karl Kautsky who, although a prominent socialist theorist, is not mentioned in the linked article "State Socialism", even less so as the inventor of the idea. I haven't read the source and have no idea about whether or not such a claim is legitimate, but it seems like there should be some consistency about this. If he did not have very much to do with the invention of the idea, than the sentence should probably be removed; if he did, the article on State Socialism should probably be altered to at least include him as one of the meaningful contributors to the idea. If anyone more knowledgeable on the matter could redress this issue, that would be great. Forsmqn (talk) 18:57, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Was Deng Xiaoping a revisionist?
[edit]Should we add him in this article?--JohnGao (talk) 01:37, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
should. Because Deng Xiaoping is a very typical revisionist rightist who "turned the left turn and turned to the right." We must boycott him. You can add him.Hetalia1922 (talk) 04:48, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
"Evolutionary Socialism" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Evolutionary Socialism. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 18#Evolutionary Socialism until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 16:07, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
"Evolutionary socialism" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Evolutionary socialism. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 18#Evolutionary socialism until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 16:07, 18 September 2020 (UTC)