Talk:Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Name of page

Is it called the Higgs Report or the Higgs Review? In asking this question I am not implying that the page name should be changed or not changed. Snowman (talk) 12:34, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you might be right actually! If you can double check, would you like to move it? Wik idea 13:32, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is not my usual line. I have added a link which implies that it is called "Higgs Review". I might move it, if you can be more sure that it is called "Higgs Review". If you are sure, then you could move it. Snowman (talk) 14:32, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But, one of the references, the 2003 pdf, on the page refers to a "Higgs report". Is that the same thing? Snowman (talk) 14:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That didn't hurt, did it! Wik idea 15:10, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The new longer name surprised me, but I think that it is the correct formal name of the review, and I have added one inline link corroborating its official name. Snowman (talk) 17:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]