Talk:Reversible!

Reversible! has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 6, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Anime and manga Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Removal of genre

@ChuChu: Could you explain your edit further? In the source I cited for the genre, it is called a "boy-on-boy" romance.--Alexandra^IDV 00:47, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Usually otokonoko material (be it manga, anime, or light novels) that's aimed at a male audience is not described as yaoi or boy's love. This kind of designation usually means a female audience is the target readership. ChuChu (talk) 11:47, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see what you're getting at - I assume calling it a romance series would work, then.--Alexandra^IDV 12:48, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Reversible!/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Abryn (talk · contribs) 09:16, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, forgot to do the review. I found only extremely minor, optional changes, nothing worth holding up the review. Mostly preference. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 09:47, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For anyone looking at this in the future: Abryn and I talked through Discord while she reviewed this, and she then forgot to post the comments here. I will include them for the record:

Collapsed log

Dusa — Today at 11:16 AM
"It was originally serialized by Ichijinsha in their magazine Waai! from April 24, 2010 to November 25, 2013, and has since also been collected in three tankōbon volumes; together with Sazanami Cherry, it was the first manga published under the Waai! Comics imprint. "
I sometimes second-guess myself, but is that semicolon appropriate?
Dusa — Today at 11:20 AM lead's good actually maybe consider mentioning why they're encouraged to crossdress in the lead? as it is, it frames the reasoning as nebulous or nonexistent
Dusa — Today at 11:22 AM Premise is good
Dusa — Today at 11:24 AM Production good
Dusa — Today at 11:26 AM in the second volume summary, are the students from the same school?
Alexandra IDV — Today at 11:27 AM Yeah, it all takes place at St Stokesia until it mentions the winter break
Dusa — Today at 11:28 AM gotcha Volumes good
Dusa — Today at 11:29 AM "found it to stand" > "felt it stood"
Alexandra IDV — Today at 11:29 AM (I'll check when I'm at my pc but I trust your judgment)
Dusa — Today at 11:30 AM i mean i think they're both fine, but the latter is a little less wordy while communicating the same thing
Alexandra IDV — Today at 11:30 AM Mmm As long as things still are clear I also tend to prefer more concise wording
Dusa — Today at 11:31 AM "how the manga stands out" > "how the manga stood out" ; again i have a dumb baby brain sometimes, but i think because of the tense in other parts of the sentence, this part should be past tense as well other than that, Reception good
Dusa — Today at 11:32 AM honestly i'm just gonna pass it, nothing i said was a big deal, you can change to my suggestions if you want to

--Alexandra^IDV 13:25, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]